PENALTIES & ABATEMENT

Penalties are assessed by formula and abated by argument. The formula is automatic; the argument is not, and it is not made for you.

20% §6662 Accuracy-related, rising to 40% in defined cases.
§6651 Failure to file accrues five times failure to pay.
100% §6672 Trust fund penalty. Personal, and not dischargeable.
JD · CPA Attorney and accountant
30+ Years in tax practice
U.S. Tax Court Admitted to practice
FL · MA Bar admissions
1 Signature on every return

Penalties are automatic. Relief is not.

They are assessed by formula and removed by argument, and no one makes that argument unless you do.

Scheduling does not create an attorney-client relationship. No such relationship exists until the firm has run a conflicts check and both sides have signed a written engagement agreement.

The tax controversy resolution arc, showing planning, notice, examination, IRS Appeals, United States Tax Court and appellate review, with a collection branch and resolution available at every stage.
THE PENALTIES THAT MATTER MOST
Penalty and defence provisions §6662 accuracy §6651 file and pay §6672 trust fund §6664(c) reasonable cause Neonatology, 115 T.C. 43 First-time abatement

Accuracy-related penalty, section 6662

twenty percent of the underpayment, rising to forty percent in defined circumstances. Defended on substantial authority, adequate disclosure with a reasonable basis, or reasonable cause.

Failure to file and failure to pay, section 6651

the failure-to-file penalty accrues at five times the rate of the failure-to-pay penalty, which is why filing without paying is nearly always better than not filing.

Trust fund recovery penalty, section 6672

assessed personally against individuals responsible for unpaid employment taxes. It pierces the entity, and it is not dischargeable in bankruptcy.

Information return and foreign reporting penalties

assessed per form, per year, and frequently larger than the tax.

REASONABLE CAUSE

The principal defense is reasonable cause under section 6664(c). Where the taxpayer relied on professional advice, the governing test asks whether the adviser was a competent professional with sufficient expertise to justify reliance, whether the taxpayer provided necessary and accurate information, and whether the taxpayer actually relied in good faith. Neonatology Associates, P.A. v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 43 (2000), affirmed 299 F.3d 221 (3d Cir. 2002).

Reliance is not established by having engaged someone. It is established by evidence, and the evidence is assembled.

FIRST-TIME ABATEMENT

Administrative relief is available for a first failure within a clean compliance history. It is granted routinely, and it is granted only if it is requested. It is also worth preserving rather than spending on the smallest year in a multi-year exposure.

Penalties are assessed by formula and abated by argument. The argument is not made for you.

HOW AN ENGAGEMENT BEGINS
Step one

Book a free consultation

Thirty minutes, no charge. Bring the notice — we read it together on that call.

Step two

The deadline is identified

Which notice it is, what it asserts, and which forums are still open behind it.

Step three

Conflicts check and written engagement

Scope and fee agreed in writing before any work begins.

HOW A CONTROVERSY RESOLVES
Step four

The firm takes over

Correspondence with the Service runs through the firm. You stop answering.

Step five

The position is built and pressed

Records, authority, and the argument — pressed at the earliest stage that will take it, because that is the cheapest place to win.

Step six

Resolution

Closed at examination, settled at Appeals on the hazards, or tried. The firm does not hand the file to anyone to reach the last of those.

Penalty exposure is assessed at the outset, not after the adjustment lands. Contact the firm through the contact page or call (561) 529-5873. Representative engagements are described on the Experience page.

© Donovan Legal PLLC. 2026. | DISCLAIMER
Click Here To Call Donovan Legal